tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20147126.post7507814104962117994..comments2024-01-26T01:49:56.783-06:00Comments on Lagniappe's Lair: Why I cry for tomorrow's youthMurphy's Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17164780742334950772noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20147126.post-46325783388329651892014-03-14T19:18:55.066-05:002014-03-14T19:18:55.066-05:00Ditto with PH. Slaves in The South were a capital ...Ditto with PH. Slaves in The South were a capital investment which required maintenance and upkeep. Free labor of The North could be paid small wages and were responsible for their own upkeep and maintenance.<br /><br />(I personally find the concept of owning another person not-right, but history proves me in the minority. Furthermore, slavery to the slave may be preferable over the alternative. And perhaps this nation is headed that direction: you're poor, out of work, "benefits" ran out, hungry? I'll take care of you under "these" conditions ...)<br /><br />QAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20147126.post-13245294189001356072014-03-14T10:10:47.593-05:002014-03-14T10:10:47.593-05:00Can't have anything running contrary to the &#...Can't have anything running contrary to the 'agenda' don't ya know...Old NFOhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16404197287935017147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20147126.post-9819204096869398662014-03-13T22:07:58.694-05:002014-03-13T22:07:58.694-05:00And if anybody actually knew history anymore they&...And if anybody actually knew history anymore they'd know that this point was one argued just before the Civil War because the Industrial Revolution in the North, although employing rather than enslaving per se, created an underclass that lived in horrible conditions while being paid a pittance and existing in de facto slavery.ProudHillbillyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14305205710265854978noreply@blogger.com