Friday, November 06, 2009

Obama gives shout-outs and congratulates staff while soldiers lay dying at Ft. Hood

Every day I find another reason to dislike this guy. No matter how many times I try to give him the benefit of the doubt, he always finds some new way to highlight his arrogance and narcissism.

The latest example: Him taking the stage after being informed of the massacre of 12 Americans at Ft. Hood, Texas by a deranged muslim, only to congratulate his staff and give a "shout out".

President Obama didn't wait long after Tuesday's devastating elections to give critics another reason to question his leadership, but this time the subject matter was more grim than a pair of governorships.

After news broke out of the shooting at the Fort Hood Army post in Texas, the nation watched in horror as the toll of dead and injured climbed. The White House was notified immediately and by late afternoon, word went out that the president would speak about the incident prior to a previously scheduled appearance. At about 5 p.m., cable stations went to the president. The situation called for not only his trademark eloquence, but also grace and perspective.

But instead of a somber chief executive offering reassuring words and expressions of sympathy and compassion, viewers saw a wildly disconnected and inappropriately light president YouTube- Fort Hood Tragedy -- Barack Obama Gives Odd "Shout-Out" Before He Comments on Massacre -- FOX News. At the event, a Tribal Nations Conference hosted by the Department of Interior's Bureau of Indian affairs, the president thanked various staffers and offered a "shout-out" to "Dr. Joe Medicine Crow -- that Congressional Medal of Honor winner." Three minutes in, the president spoke about the shooting, in measured and appropriate terms. Who is advising him?

Anyone at home aware of the major news story of the previous hours had to have been stunned. An incident like this requires a scrapping of the early light banter. The president should apologize for the tone of his remarks, explain what has happened, express sympathy for those slain and appeal for calm and patience until all the facts are in. That's the least that should occur.

Indeed, an argument could be made that Obama should have canceled the Indian event, out of respect for people having been murdered at an Army post a few hours before. That would have prevented any sort of jarring emotional switch at the event.

Did the president's team not realize what sort of image they were presenting to the country at this moment? The disconnect between what Americans at home knew had been going on -- and the initial words coming out of their president's mouth was jolting, if not disturbing.

It must have been disappointing for many politically aware Democrats, still reeling from the election two days before. The New Jersey gubernatorial vote had already demonstrated that the president and his political team couldn't produce a winning outcome in a state very friendly to Democrats (and where the president won by 15 points one year ago). And now this? Congressional Democrats must wonder if a White House that has burdened them with a too-heavy policy agenda over the last year has a strong enough political operation to help push that agenda through.

If the president's communications apparatus can't inform -- and protect -- their boss during tense moments when the country needs to see a focused commander-in-chief and a compassionate head of state, it has disastrous consequences for that president's party and supporters.
All the president's men (and women) fell down on the job Thursday. And Democrats across the country have real reason to panic.

Here he is, folks. Take a good look at him.

And I don't ever want to hear another word about President Bush's reaction to the 9/11 attacks again. Obama's response was a hundred times worse. He actually had time to prepare his comments after being advised of the situation, and back-patting and a "shout out" was still more important to him than the deaths of a dozen Americans.


  1. Seriously, does this shock anyone? If he had a original patriotic thought (rather than the ones his handlers tell him to say), well... It would be a lonely, little creature, now, wouldn't it?

  2. That's just sickening. How could he do that? What in the world was he thinking?

  3. Pathetic, truly despicable. His speech was so prepared for that Indian conference, that he could not possibly deviate and make the somber comments first for fear of sounding "less prepared" and using his usual fillers of "Uh" and "Ummm" and "Look" when he can't answer a question. He would have lost his train of thought and sounded like the idiot he is. Instead, he came off like the insensitive clod he is. And I hope all the world was watching and saw what they have done voting such a dick into office.

    Oh, and someone should tell him that you don't WIN the Medal of Honor, you have to EARN it. Unlike the Peace Prize.
    What a jackass.

  4. The Tom "effing" Foolery coming from this Admin.I said would be worse than the Clinton years and the Carter years all rolled together....and they aren't letting me down much.