Who's there?
NOT GARRETT FOSTER! (Hee, hee! Too soon?)
Seems that someone in Austin decided to take a page from the #BLM and "customized" a memorial that his fellow-traveler wanna-be terrorists set up in his name after he died stupidly by trying to intimidate a passing motorist with his rifle. Alas, in a stunning failure of the victim-selection process, he chose to threaten a man who was lawfully carrying a gun and who also had the training and the will to use it. And that man was released by the police without charges because self-defense is understood in Texas.
On a side-note, the Libertarian Party just took ownership of this guy and his criminally-stupid actions. As if the LP wasn't irrelevant already...
Just blew coffee everywhere, Murph!
ReplyDeleteHey Murphy
ReplyDeleteWhat gets me is that the libertarian party is associating with the BLM movement, you know...the burn, loot and murder and all because the libertarians have this hardon about cops.....really....who do they think is gonna enforce this communist utopia that BLM supports by their ideology and money..The GOVERNMENT, they must have rode the short bus in school, ..the libertarians ain't thinking this through.....I am seeing the sackcloth and ashes stuff on my farcebook page and I am calling them out on it and using the words like"shortsighted" and "blind" are the mildest words I use all because this gives them an opportunity to roleplay with firearms. Soiboi made a poor decision in the victim selection process and choose poorly.
> "On a side-note, the Libertarian Party just took ownership of this guy and his criminally-stupid actions. As if the LP wasn't irrelevant already..."
ReplyDeleteQuoth the article:
"The fact in dispute is whether Foster pointed his weapon at the driver. Austin Police Chief Brian Manley said on Sunday that the driver maintained Foster had aimed his gun towards him, leading him to shoot. Several witnesses say the opposite is true."
So...you're just going to assume the witnesses are wrong so it fits whatever narrative you have against Libertarians?
> "As if the LP wasn't irrelevant already..."
No kidding. A party that literally stands for the right to do whatever you want as long are you aren't harming others is completely irrelevant because jackwangs keep setting up strawmen and then blaming libertarians.
It's rare to encounter a person as uninformed as yourself...but, strange times indeed.
DeleteMultiple, repeat, M U L T I P L E video recordings from different angles of the incident clearly show the deceased point his firearm at the driver, with his finger on the trigger.
The deceased was not a smart individual and your defense of him and the group defending him indicate a level of shortsightedness and overall idiocy that would be baffling were it not for so many of your kind running amok among the general population.
You should do yourself a favor and try to educate yourself on a situation before posting shite...your pride will eventually thank you so your face doesn't have to endure the burning red shame of embarrassment for being called out on being a knee-jerk-reactionary-moron.
It's never too early to make fun of a complete dumbass and his dumbassery choice of death.
ReplyDeleteAs to the Libertarians, have they ever been relevant? As a personal agenda, it's good, but as a functional party they've always been decidedly unfuntional.
And the more they go full potato, the more they (as a party) become targets for the potential upcoming festivities.
Play stupid games, win the Darwin award.
ReplyDelete