Wednesday, August 30, 2017

And speaking of the AN-2.

This comes out the day after I post about one. Coincidence?

North Korea's antique airplane could be its most dangerous weapon yet

I think I need to get one now.

9 comments:

  1. Yer link is busted. I got an "access denied".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry, any journo that uses the word "aircrafts" in an article, instantly loses all credibility with me.

    All B.S. as far as I am concerned.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is it A concern? Yes - is it a BIG concern? No.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Murphy;

    I got the "Access denied" thingie on my screen, I think your link is broken..Like your fence is when Belle gets out...LOL

    ReplyDelete
  5. OT, but I hope Harvey stays west of you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. For $47k you could buy one.


    Of course, you'd have to ship it out of Poland, but no guts, no glory.

    Others for sale include a Bulgarian one setup for dropping parajumpers, and a pack of three AN-2s for $224k - cheaper in bulk, they are.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Meh, AN-2 vs. Stinger, Stinger wins every time!

    ReplyDelete
  8. remove the .html...


    http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/08/29/north-koreas-antique-airplane-could-be-its-most-dangerous-weapon-yet

    ReplyDelete
  9. Did you catch this?:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/12/nyregion/submarine-hackensack-uss-ling.html?_r=0

    Navy doesn't want it. (why does that Sinatra movie about a Queen and a sub come to mind?)

    ReplyDelete